Fact: “The Directorate of Science and Technology is the primary organization for research and development (R&D) in the Department of Homeland Security. With a budget of $830.3 million in FY2008, it conducts R&D in several laboratories of its own [and] funds R&D conducted by industry, the Department of Energy national laboratories, other government agencies, and universities.”
Analysis: The quote above comes from my hot-off-the-press copy of the new Congressional Research Service report (a pdf version here) on the Department of Homeland Security’s Science and Technology Directorate. Bottom line: CRS notes that “Congress and others have been highly critical of the directorate’s performance. Although recent management changes have somewhat muted this criticism, fundamental issues remain.”
By the way, you’ll get a special bonus for reading to the end of this post, derived from an obscure footnote in the report.
The report is being reported in short-hand in the Beltway technology media, as criticizing DHS S&T for not being receptive to industry. “DHS Directorate Elusive, CRS Report States,” is the headline in Federal Computer Week. The sister pub WashingtonTechnology has the same story with a different head: “CRS: DHS Directorate Lacks Collaborative Spirit.” And yes, the report does detail the poor job DHS does at providing an open door to new ideas and technologies from the private sector.
But there’s a lot more in the report and it deserves more thoughtful reading & reporting, as it goes into some detail into the difficulties in bringing powerful and effective new technical and scientific approaches to bear for homeland defense and the war on terror.
Filed under: Government, Intelligence, R&D, Technology | Tagged: Bayesian, Boeing, Congress, Congressional Research Service, CRS, Darlene Druyan, DARPA, defense intelligence agency, DHS, DIA, Federal Computer Week, Government, GWOT, Homeland Defense, Homeland Security, HSARPA, IARPA, Jack Shanahan, JIVA, Joint Intelligence virtual architecture, MSIC, R&D, research, science, startup, startups, tech, Technology, terrorism, war on terror | 4 Comments »
And that, accurately enough, leads to Alien. The truth about Alien, fortunately, is benign, at least for Americans concerned about privacy issues. The Post’s misguided premise, that Alien is “about new ways of using personal information,” strays from the fact that DIA information is solely on valid intelligence targets and non-US persons only. “Both the law and strict oversight enforce this,” reads 
Shepherd's Pi 